REST vs GraphQL: Which API Paradigm is Right for Your Project?
REST and GraphQL are the two dominant approaches to API design. REST uses multiple endpoints with fixed data structures; GraphQL uses a single endpoint with flexible queries.
// Table of Contents
Quick Overview
REST
REST (Representational State Transfer) organizes APIs around resources with standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE). Each endpoint returns a fixed data structure. Simple, cacheable, and widely understood.
GraphQL
GraphQL is a query language that lets clients request exactly the data they need through a single endpoint. It eliminates over-fetching and under-fetching, but adds complexity with schemas, resolvers, and query planning.
Data Fetching Patterns
The fundamental difference is how data is requested and received:
REST: Each resource has its own endpoint. To display a user profile with their posts and followers, you might need 3 separate HTTP requests: GET /users/1, GET /users/1/posts, GET /users/1/followers. Each returns a fixed payload defined by the server.
GraphQL: A single query to /graphql can request all of this data at once, and the client specifies exactly which fields it needs. No over-fetching, no multiple round trips.
Caching
REST APIs benefit from HTTP caching naturally. Each URL represents a resource that can be cached at the CDN, browser, or proxy level. Cache invalidation is straightforward because URLs map to resources.
GraphQL caching is more complex. Since all queries go to a single endpoint with varying payloads, HTTP caching doesn't work out of the box. You need application-level caching (Apollo Client, Relay) or persisted queries to achieve similar caching benefits.
Verdict: REST wins on caching simplicity. This matters significantly for public APIs and high-traffic applications.
Type Safety & Documentation
GraphQL is inherently typed. The schema defines every type, field, and relationship, enabling excellent tooling, auto-completion, and client-side type generation (GraphQL Code Generator).
REST APIs achieve type safety through OpenAPI (Swagger) specifications. With FastAPI, this is automatic. The quality of REST API typing depends on whether teams maintain their OpenAPI specs.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | REST | GraphQL |
|---|---|---|
| Endpoints | Multiple (per resource) | Single (/graphql) |
| Data Fetching | Fixed response shapes | Client-specified fields |
| Over-fetching | Common | Eliminated |
| Under-fetching | Requires multiple requests | Eliminated |
| Caching | HTTP caching (easy) | Application-level (complex) |
| File Upload | Simple (multipart) | Complex (multipart spec) |
| Learning Curve | Low | Medium-High |
| Tooling | curl, Postman, any HTTP client | Specialized clients needed |
| Error Handling | HTTP status codes | Always 200 (errors in body) |
| Versioning | URL or header versioning | Schema evolution |
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Choose REST if:
- Your API is resource-oriented with clear CRUD operations
- HTTP caching is important for performance
- You're building a public API consumed by third parties
- Your team is familiar with REST and HTTP
- You need simple file upload and download
Choose GraphQL if:
- Clients need flexible data access with nested relationships
- You have multiple client types (mobile, web, TV) with different data needs
- Frontend teams need to iterate on data requirements independently
- You're aggregating data from multiple backend services
- Real-time subscriptions are a core requirement
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use both REST and GraphQL?
Absolutely, and many companies do. A common pattern is REST for public APIs (better caching, simpler for third-party consumers) and GraphQL for internal APIs (flexible data fetching for your own frontend teams). They can coexist in the same system.
Is GraphQL faster than REST?
Not inherently. GraphQL can be faster by eliminating multiple round trips (one query instead of many requests). However, GraphQL queries can also be slower if they trigger expensive nested resolvers. Performance depends on implementation quality, not the paradigm itself.
Need expert backend development?
I build scalable Python APIs and backend systems. Let's discuss your project.
Get in Touch